β
Purpose of Comparisonβ
The State
and Strategy
patterns both aim to enable interchangeable behaviors, but they serve different design purposes. This comparison clarifies when to use each pattern by examining their intent, structure, and usage in practice.
β
Comparison Overviewβ
Aspect | State | Strategy |
---|
Primary Purpose | Switch behavior based on internal state | Switch behavior via external strategy |
Structure | Delegates to state-specific classes | Delegates to strategy-specific classes |
Trigger for Change | Internal state transitions | External configuration or injection |
Switching Mechanism | Object manages its own state transition | Client selects and injects strategy |
State Management | Maintains current state | Stateless, focuses on algorithms |
β
Similaritiesβ
- Both patterns support behavioral flexibility without complex conditionals.
- Behavior is delegated via shared interfaces, improving extensibility.
- Used to encapsulate variant logic and reduce code duplication.
β
Key Differencesβ
Perspective | State Pattern | Strategy Pattern |
---|
Ownership | Controlled by the objectβs internal logic | Controlled by the external caller |
Dynamic Switching | State transitions happen within the object | Strategy changes happen externally |
Concept of State | Explicit stateful behavior with transitions | Stateless, context-independent behavior |
Client Role | Unaware of internal state handling | Responsible for selecting strategy |
β
When to Choose Whichβ
- β
Use State when behavior depends on the object's internal condition
- β
Use Strategy when you need to switch algorithms or policies externally
- β
Choose State when transitions happen as part of object workflow
- β
Choose Strategy when you need configurable or testable behaviors
β
UML Class Diagramβ
State Patternβ
Strategy Patternβ
β
Practical Design Notesβ
- β
Use State when implementing domain logic that changes over time (e.g., login status, order phases).
- β
Use Strategy when separating interchangeable policies or behaviors (e.g., notification methods, authentication).
- βΆοΈ These patterns are often confusedβunderstand who initiates the change and where state is stored.
β
Summaryβ
State
encapsulates behavior changes based on internal transitions.
Strategy
encapsulates interchangeable behaviors selected externally.
- While structurally similar, they differ in control flow and behavioral ownership.
- Choosing the correct pattern depends on whether flexibility is required in internal evolution or external configuration.