Skip to main content

🔍 Observer vs Mediator

✅ Purpose of Comparison

Observer and Mediator are both design patterns used to manage communication between multiple objects.
However, they differ fundamentally in their direction of communication and structural centralization.
This comparison highlights the structural distinctions and usage scenarios to help in selecting the appropriate pattern.

✅ Comparison Overview

AspectObserverMediator
IntentNotify dependent objects of state changesCentralize communication between multiple components
Primary UseReactive updates, event notificationUI coordination, chat systems, multi-component workflows
StructurePublisher holds and notifies SubscribersMediator coordinates interactions among Participants
ReusabilityNotification logic decoupled from recipientsComponents reusable without depending on each other
ExtensibilityAdd new Subscribers for extended behaviorChange Mediator to alter interaction patterns centrally
DownsidesCan become tangled with complex dependency chainsMediator tends to grow large and complex

✅ Similarities

  • Both manage collaboration between multiple objects
  • Triggered by state changes or events
  • Promote loose coupling by decoupling direct interactions

✅ Key Differences

AspectObserverMediator
CommunicationUnidirectional (Subject → Observer)Bidirectional or multi-directional (via Mediator)
CentralizationNone (decentralized notification)Present (centralized coordination)
ScalabilityBecomes harder to manage as observers growEasier to manage via central coordination
Dependency StructureCan lead to many-to-many dependenciesReduces direct dependencies via a single point
Typical Use CaseState change notifications (UI updates, monitoring)Complex coordination (chat apps, UI integration)

✅ When to Choose Which

  • ✅ Use Observer when you want to broadcast state changes
  • ✅ Use Mediator when you want to coordinate multiple participants
  • ✅ Choose Observer for event-driven reactions
  • ✅ Choose Mediator for structured control flow between components

✅ UML Class Diagram

Observer Pattern

Mediator Pattern

✅ Practical Design Notes

  • Observer is useful for live updates (e.g., UI refresh, metric notifications), but too many observers can lead to complex control logic.
  • Mediator excels when multiple components interact with each other, offering a centralized structure to coordinate their behavior.
  • ▶️ Example: If you want to notify multiple parts about a change, use Observer; if you want to manage interdependent UI logic centrally, use Mediator.

✅ Summary

  • Observer is designed for state change notification and fits decentralized reaction-based designs
  • Mediator is intended for interaction coordination, offering centralized control among components
  • Both patterns reduce tight coupling, but differ in structure: decentralized vs centralized