🔍 Observer vs Mediator
✅ Purpose of Comparison
Observer
and Mediator
are both design patterns used to manage communication between multiple objects.
However, they differ fundamentally in their direction of communication and structural centralization.
This comparison highlights the structural distinctions and usage scenarios to help in selecting the appropriate pattern.
✅ Comparison Overview
Aspect | Observer | Mediator |
---|---|---|
Intent | Notify dependent objects of state changes | Centralize communication between multiple components |
Primary Use | Reactive updates, event notification | UI coordination, chat systems, multi-component workflows |
Structure | Publisher holds and notifies Subscribers | Mediator coordinates interactions among Participants |
Reusability | Notification logic decoupled from recipients | Components reusable without depending on each other |
Extensibility | Add new Subscribers for extended behavior | Change Mediator to alter interaction patterns centrally |
Downsides | Can become tangled with complex dependency chains | Mediator tends to grow large and complex |
✅ Similarities
- Both manage collaboration between multiple objects
- Triggered by state changes or events
- Promote loose coupling by decoupling direct interactions
✅ Key Differences
Aspect | Observer | Mediator |
---|---|---|
Communication | Unidirectional (Subject → Observer) | Bidirectional or multi-directional (via Mediator) |
Centralization | None (decentralized notification) | Present (centralized coordination) |
Scalability | Becomes harder to manage as observers grow | Easier to manage via central coordination |
Dependency Structure | Can lead to many-to-many dependencies | Reduces direct dependencies via a single point |
Typical Use Case | State change notifications (UI updates, monitoring) | Complex coordination (chat apps, UI integration) |
✅ When to Choose Which
- ✅ Use Observer when you want to broadcast state changes
- ✅ Use Mediator when you want to coordinate multiple participants
- ✅ Choose Observer for event-driven reactions
- ✅ Choose Mediator for structured control flow between components
✅ UML Class Diagram
Observer Pattern
Mediator Pattern
✅ Practical Design Notes
- ✅ Observer is useful for live updates (e.g., UI refresh, metric notifications), but too many observers can lead to complex control logic.
- ✅ Mediator excels when multiple components interact with each other, offering a centralized structure to coordinate their behavior.
- ▶️ Example: If you want to notify multiple parts about a change, use
Observer
; if you want to manage interdependent UI logic centrally, useMediator
.
✅ Summary
Observer
is designed for state change notification and fits decentralized reaction-based designsMediator
is intended for interaction coordination, offering centralized control among components- Both patterns reduce tight coupling, but differ in structure: decentralized vs centralized