Summary
Pattern Comparison
| Pattern | When to Apply | Strengths | Caveats | Common Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Singleton | When a shared instance is required | Centralized state, easy access | Can complicate testing and mocking | Logger, configuration, caching |
Facade | When simplifying multiple internal calls | Clean API surface, hides internal logic | Facade may grow too complex internally | Subsystem access, logging wrapper |
Choosing the Right Pattern
- For unified access to shared utilities →
Singleton - To simplify multiple operations into one call →
Facade - Consider combining with
Dependency Injection (DI)orAdapterto improve testability and flexibility
Team Discussion Snippets
- “We’re calling Logger directly everywhere—let’s make it a
Singleton.” - “Logging and config access could be wrapped in a
Facadefor cleaner usage.” - “If we’re using
process.envall over, let’s centralize it with aConfigclass.”